Skip to main content

In Estate of Kam

Opinion Date 2016-12-29
  • Court Line: Dallas
  • Citation: Not Reported in S.W. Rptr.
  • Ruling: Affirm
  • Appellate Standard: Sufficiency of the evidence
  • Probate Court: Yes
Details
Proponent(s):
Unspecified
  • Executor as Proponent: Yes
  • Testator Male or Female: Male
  • Testator Education Summary: Unknown
  • Testator Sophistication Rating: Unknown

  • Prevailing Party in Trial Court: Proponent
  • Prevailing Party in COA: Appellee
  • Amount of Attorneys' Fees: $ 198000.
  • Testamentary or Contractual Capacity Case: Contractual
  • Parallel Cite: 2016 WL 7473905
  • Docket Number: 05–16–00126–CV

Outcomes
  • Our Summary:

    Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying contestant's statutory bill of review. Contestant failed to properly admit evidence in the trial court.

Summaries
  • Reversed on Capacity Issue: No
  • Reversed on Undue Influence: No